1. Evidence of a hotel owner testimony: to prove the defendant and the victim was an altercation, the defendant used the victim after being crushed by the bottle.
2. II evidence, Liu Ying Li friend good news testimony: to prove that the defendant and the victim several times after the breakup of the victim struggled, and even a threat to the victim.
3. Three of evidence, the autopsy report of Liu Ying. Liu proved that because of this Bottle attack died. To provide evidence of the prosecution finished
4. Finished the burden of proof
5. Prosecutor did not agree on the defender's negligence caused the death of defense, Zhang Tianwei as an adult, but also medical students, it should be clearly aware of their possible consequences of acts of
6. Defendant does have alcohol, but not to say that it does not have the ability to identify and control. China's Criminal Law Article 18, paragraph 4, clearly states that "those who drink of criminal responsibility for crimes."
7.'s Defender over views have no legal basis for the appeal to the Court seriously.
8. Prosecutor on the case is evidence of the circumstances of the case and issued the following advice, please pay attention to the court.
The full evidence in this case, the facts are clear.
In the court investigation, prosecutors would have been the case throughout the clarity of objective facts to show the court that: the defendant Zhang Tianwei as a result of anger excited by the bottle hit the victim back of the head Liu Ying, Liu Ying-induced death! The defendant's acts against Liu with the death of a direct causal link! At the same time, the public prosecutor to produce evidence to the court and the defendant by the court and counsel to cross-examine fully proved that the accused intentionally hit the victim, knowing that death may occur As a result, the death of a laissez-faire is the result of deliberate acts of murder!
The accused in this case, Zhang Tianwei adult (21 years), with a total capacity of criminal responsibility, and accused Zhang Tianwei for the medical students should be aware of their behavior may have against the results of the death of the victim.
According to the 14th People's Republic of China Criminal Law stipulates that the accused constituted Tianwei Zhang murder!
Zhang Tianwei accused in the 2005 theft was sentenced to 10 months in prison, according to the People's Republic of China Criminal Law related to the 65th article stipulates that should be punished severely.
The law of every one of us the right to life, at the same time the law to crack down on violations of the rights of the criminals we have to protect our rights, the right to life of every citizen to enjoy the inalienable right in accordance with the law, no one has the right to deprive illegal, or else Is bound to be severely punished by the law!
To sum up, the indictment in this case that the accused intended to kill the criminal facts are clear and adequate evidence, according to the People's Republic of the 232nd article of the Criminal Code, the 65th article in accordance with the law to be convicted and punished severely ! Of the judiciary, public prosecution views expressed finished!
才50分就要别人翻译至少半小时？？？甚至更多时间。。
ssss
1. Evidence of a hotel owner testimony: to prove the defendant and the victim was an altercation, the defendant used the victim after being crushed by the bottle.
2. II evidence, Liu Ying Li friend good news testimony: to prove that the defendant and the victim several times after the breakup of the victim struggled, and even a threat to the victim.
3. Three of evidence, the autopsy report of Liu Ying. Liu proved that because of this Bottle attack died. To provide evidence of the prosecution finished
4. Finished the burden of proof
5. Prosecutor did not agree on the defender's negligence caused the death of defense, Zhang Tianwei as an adult, but also medical students, it should be clearly aware of their possible consequences of acts of
6. Defendant does have alcohol, but not to say that it does not have the ability to identify and control. China's Criminal Law Article 18, paragraph 4, clearly states that "those who drink of criminal responsibility for crimes."
7.'s Defender over views have no legal basis for the appeal to the Court seriously.
8. Prosecutor on the case is evidence of the circumstances of the case and issued the following advice, please pay attention to the court.
The full evidence in this case, the facts are clear.
In the court investigation, prosecutors would have been the case throughout the clarity of objective facts to show the court that: the defendant Zhang Tianwei as a result of anger excited by the bottle hit the victim back of the head Liu Ying, Liu Ying-induced death! The defendant's acts against Liu with the death of a direct causal link! At the same time, the public prosecutor to produce evidence to the court and the defendant by the court and counsel to cross-examine fully proved that the accused intentionally hit the victim, knowing that death may occur As a result, the death of a laissez-faire is the result of deliberate acts of murder!
The accused in this case, Zhang Tianwei adult (21 years), with a total capacity of criminal responsibility, and accused Zhang Tianwei for the medical students should be aware of their behavior may have against the results of the death of the victim.
According to the 14th People's Republic of China Criminal Law stipulates that the accused constituted Tianwei Zhang murder!
Zhang Tianwei accused in the 2005 theft was sentenced to 10 months in prison, according to the People's Republic of China Criminal Law related to the 65th article stipulates that should be punished severely.
The law of every one of us the right to life, at the same time the law to crack down on violations of the rights of the criminals we have to protect our rights, the right to life of every citizen to enjoy the inalienable right in accordance with the law, no one has the right to deprive illegal, or else Is bound to be severely punished by the law!
To sum up, the indictment in this case that the accused intended to kill the criminal facts are clear and adequate evidence, according to the People's Republic of the 232nd article of the Criminal Code, the 65th article in accordance with the law to be convicted and punished severely ! Of the judiciary, public prosecution views expressed finished! 相信我
1. Evidence of a hotel owner testimony: to prove the defendant and the victim was an altercation, the defendant used the victim after being crushed by the bottle.
2. II evidence, Liu Ying Li friend good news testimony: to prove that the defendant and the victim several times after the breakup of the victim struggled, and even a threat to the victim.
3. Three of evidence, the autopsy report of Liu Ying. Liu proved that because of this Bottle attack died. To provide evidence of the prosecution finished
4. Finished the burden of proof
5. Prosecutor did not agree on the defender's negligence caused the death of defense, Zhang Tianwei as an adult, but also medical students, it should be clearly aware of their possible consequences of acts of
6. Defendant does have alcohol, but not to say that it does not have the ability to identify and control. China's Criminal Law Article 18, paragraph 4, clearly states that "those who drink of criminal responsibility for crimes."
7.'s Defender over views have no legal basis for the appeal to the Court seriously.
8. Prosecutor on the case is evidence of the circumstances of the case and issued the following advice, please pay attention to the court.
The full evidence in this case, the facts are clear.
In the court investigation, prosecutors would have been the case throughout the clarity of objective facts to show the court that: the defendant Zhang Tianwei as a result of anger excited by the bottle hit the victim back of the head Liu Ying, Liu Ying-induced death! The defendant's acts against Liu with the death of a direct causal link! At the same time, the public prosecutor to produce evidence to the court and the defendant by the court and counsel to cross-examine fully proved that the accused intentionally hit the victim, knowing that death may occur As a result, the death of a laissez-faire is the result of deliberate acts of murder!
The accused in this case, Zhang Tianwei adult (21 years), with a total capacity of criminal responsibility, and accused Zhang Tianwei for the medical students should be aware of their behavior may have against the results of the death of the victim.
According to the 14th People's Republic of China Criminal Law stipulates that the accused constituted Tianwei Zhang murder!
Zhang Tianwei accused in the 2005 theft was sentenced to 10 months in prison, according to the People's Republic of China Criminal Law related to the 65th article stipulates that should be punished severely.
The law of every one of us the right to life, at the same time the law to crack down on violations of the rights of the criminals we have to protect our rights, the right to life of every citizen to enjoy the inalienable right in accordance with the law, no one has the right to deprive illegal, or else Is bound to be severely punished by the law!
To sum up, the indictment in this case that the accused intended to kill the criminal facts are clear and adequate evidence, according to the People's Republic of the 232nd article of the Criminal Code, the 65th article in accordance with the law to be convicted and punished severely ! Of the judiciary, public prosecution views expressed finished!
中文 > 英语 互换翻译
内容全部来源于网络收集，如有侵权，请联系网站删除：QQ：24596024